En weer laten Putin & Shoigu afzinken enorm oorlogsschip toe

En weer laten Putin & Shoigu het toe dat een enorme oorlogsbodem van de Russische marine afgeschoten wordt. De slapte van de twee kost vele Russische levens. Kijk het filmpje "Revanche is a must" HIER. Dit geeft de Oekraïners, die verder aardig in de verdrukking zit, natuurlijk weer een enorme boost.

**************************************************************

14/02/24. Een opmerking van het kanaal “Oudere Eddy”.

“Het hoofdinlichtingendirectoraat heeft een video gepubliceerd van de aanval op het grote landingsschip Caesar Kunikov. Natuurlijk zullen er nu veel berichten zijn die zeggen dat de Britten aan alles hebben gedacht, en dat de Amerikanen toezicht hielden vanaf een drone en zeedrones aanstuurden. Ja, dat is waarschijnlijk wat er is gebeurd, maar op zijn zachtst gezegd ben ik perplex door de Zwarte Zeevloot, die herhaaldelijk aanvallen op oorlogsschepen mist.

Het Russische ministerie van Defensie zwijgt nog steeds. We wachten uiteraard op officieel commentaar, anders zou je onbewust iets in diskrediet kunnen brengen.”

COMMENTAAR: BRON

Nieuwe posts bekijken

Gesprek

Russians With Attitude

@RWApodcast

Telegram channel "Russian engineer" about the successful Ukrainian attack on the "Caesar Kunikov": Regarding the dock landing ship (LSD). The video of the strike on the ship has already been posted on Western social media, so there is no point in pretending that it does not exist. If we move away from emotional assessments of who should be kicked out, etc., and go through the technical nuances of this event, we can make the following observations: First, judging by the video, the LSD was motionless. Secondly, the naval drone's thermal imager shows people standing quietly on the bridge and deck, so it was not seen. Thirdly, the attack was carried out, again, by more than one device. Fourthly, the speed of the naval drone's approach was low, not more than 10 knots at first glance. A number of conclusions follow from this. The low speed of the naval drone is necessary for stealth. Obviously, there was no thermal imager on the bridge, or they were not used. The attack was at night time, based on the fact that the approach of the naval drone at low speed would not be detected by the crew. Thus we can understand the tactics that allowed the owners to destroy already two ships of the Black Sea Fleet - the attack at night on the ships stationary in the open sea, using a modified tactic of "Wolf Pack". I don't need to remind you who is its author. Another important point - naval drones have a very limited radius of detection of ships, 3-4 km maximum (1.5-2 miles), due to the low altitude of the camera location. Therefore, it is possible to control then by satellite, but without targeting this pack makes no sense. That is most likely they were guided by the Global Hawk which regularly hangs out near the coast of Crimea. And accordingly, the Global Hawk is a direct participant in the attack, which in theory should be suppressed by the fleet's air defense. The detection range of a target from it at an altitude of 16 km is several tens or even up to a hundred kilometers in the optical range, and when conducting electronic intelligence, up to a thousand. This raises the question of maintaining radio silence on LSDs. And the main conclusion is that speed in the open sea is the main factor of survival. At a speed of even 10 knots, guidance would be complicated, and a stealth attack is impossible. And where are our air and boat patrols? Destroying naval drones is easy, the difficult task is to detect them.